lysine less biotinylated ubiquitin (R&D Systems)
Structured Review
![Figure 1. In vitro reconstitution of STAM1 ubiquitination by AIP4. A, STAM1 ubiquitination by AIP4 was reconstituted in vitro and performed in the presence of increasing concentrations of βarrestin1. Ubiquitination reactions comprised of E1(Ube1, 42 nM), E2 (UbcH7, 350 nM), E3 (AIP4, 48.5 nM), <t>ubiquitin</t> (11.6 μM), DTT (1 mM), ATP (1 mM) plus STAM1 (42 nM), and varying concentrations of βarr1 (0 nM, 20 nM, 40 nM, 80 nM, 160 nM, or 320 nM) in 40 μl. Reactions were incubated for 90 min at 37 C and terminated with 40 μl 2× sample buffer. Equal volumes were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)] and unmodified STAM1 are indicated. Immunoblots are from one representative experiment. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B) and ubiquitin (C) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as line graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal at 300 nM βarr1 and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments. Curves were fitted by nonlinear regression, Michaelis–Menten (GraphPad Prism). AIP4, atrophin-interacting protein 4; STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.](https://pub-med-unpaywalled-images-cdn.bioz.com/pub_med_ids_ending_with_1209/pm37981209/pm37981209__page2_image1.jpg)
Lysine Less Biotinylated Ubiquitin, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 92/100, based on 15 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/lysines+n+terminal+biotin+ubiquitin/Recombinant+Human+Ubiquitin+N-Terminal+Biotin+Protein%2C+CF/pm37981209-233-10-19
Average 92 stars, based on 15 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "β-arrestin1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor for substrate linear polyubiquitination."
Article Title: β-arrestin1 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase adaptor for substrate linear polyubiquitination.
Journal: The Journal of biological chemistry
doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105474
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 1. In vitro reconstitution of STAM1 ubiquitination by AIP4. A, STAM1 ubiquitination by AIP4 was reconstituted in vitro and performed in the presence of increasing concentrations of βarrestin1. Ubiquitination reactions comprised of E1(Ube1, 42 nM), E2 (UbcH7, 350 nM), E3 (AIP4, 48.5 nM), ubiquitin (11.6 μM), DTT (1 mM), ATP (1 mM) plus STAM1 (42 nM), and varying concentrations of βarr1 (0 nM, 20 nM, 40 nM, 80 nM, 160 nM, or 320 nM) in 40 μl. Reactions were incubated for 90 min at 37 C and terminated with 40 μl 2× sample buffer. Equal volumes were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)] and unmodified STAM1 are indicated. Immunoblots are from one representative experiment. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B) and ubiquitin (C) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as line graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal at 300 nM βarr1 and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments. Curves were fitted by nonlinear regression, Michaelis–Menten (GraphPad Prism). AIP4, atrophin-interacting protein 4; STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: In Vitro, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Incubation, SDS Page, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 2. Analysis of STAM1 ubiquitination with a STAM1 binding-deficient variant of β-arrestin1. A, ubiquitination reactions as described in Experimental procedures were incubated with 40 nM WT β-arr1 (WT) or STAM binding-deficient variant βarr1-4A (4A) in the presence or absence of 1 mM ATP. Reactions were immediately (0 min) terminated or after incubation at 37 C for 20 min in 2× sample buffer. Reactions were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)] and unmodified STAM1 are indicated. Immunoblots are from one repre- sentative experiment. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B) and ubiquitin (C) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as bar graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal with WT βarr1 incubated for 20 min and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments. D, binding analysis of AIP4 to WT or 4A βarr1. Equal amounts (500 ng) of purified WT or 4A βarr1 were incubated with equimolar amounts (1 μM) of GST-AIP4 and GST immobilized on glutathione-Sepharose resin. Bound βarr1 was detected by immunoblotting. A small fraction (1%) of purified protein is shown as input. Blots were stained with Ponceau-S to show the level of GST-AIP4 and GST used in the binding reactions. Blots are from one representative experiment. E, bound βarr1 was quantified using densitometry, normalized to GST, and shown as a bar graph. Data were expressed relative to the WT βarr1 signal and represent the mean ± S.D. from four independent experiments. Data were analyzed by an unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism. The adjusted p values are indicated. AIP4, atrophin-interacting protein 4; n.s., not significant; STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Binding Assay, Variant Assay, Incubation, SDS Page, Western Blot, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 3. Mass spectrometry analysis of STAM1 ubiquitination. A, workflow of mass spectrometry analysis of STAM1 ubiquitination. Ubiquitination reactions were as described in Experimental procedures (1), trypsin digested (2), analyzed by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) (3) and peptide identification (4). B, schematic of STAM1 and ubiquitin summary of mass spectrometry results. The green color corresponds to peptide coverage of STAM1 or ubiquitin that was observed in the mass spectrometry results, while the gray color corresponds to areas that were not covered. STAM has 29 lysine residues (indicated by ticks), with seven lysine residues identified to be modified by ubiquitin are indicated by magenta ticks. Lysine 136 (K136) is indicated and is located within the VHS (Vps27, HRS, STAM) domain. The UIM (ubiquitin interacting motif), SH3 (Src-homology domain 3) and the coiled-coil domains are shown. Ubiquitin has seven lysine residues (indicated by ticks); modified residues are indicated (K11, K27, K29, K48, and K63). The first methionine on ubiquitin was also modified by ubiquitin (M1). The figure was created with BioRender. STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: Mass Spectrometry, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Liquid Chromatography, Liquid Chromatography with Mass Spectroscopy
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 4. Evaluation of lysine 136 on STAM1 ubiquitination with WT or lysine-less ubiquitin. Ubiquitination reactions as described in Experimental procedures were incubated with WT STAM1 (WT) or variant in which lysine 136 has been substituted with an arginine (K136R) and with WT ubiquitin (WT Ub) (A) or lysine-less ubiquitin (0K Ub) (D). Reactions were performed in the presence of 40 nM βarr1 and with or without 1 mM ATP/MgCl2. Reactions were immediately (0 min) terminated in 2× sample buffer or after incubation at 37 C for 20 min (A) or 60 min (B). Reactions were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)], unmodified and monoubiquitinated (mono-Ub) STAM1 are indicated. Immu- noblots are from one representative experiment. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B and E) and ubiquitin (C and F) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as bar graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal with WT STAM1 and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments. G, purified βarr1 (0.1 μM) was incubated without (empty resin; n/a) or with immobilized STAM1-His (3 μM) WT or K136R variant for 20 min at 37 C. Complexes were analyzed by immunoblotting. Immunoblots are from a representative experiment. H, bound STAM1 normalized to βarr1 was quantified using densitometry and shown as bar graphs. Data represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments and are expressed relative to the fraction of STAM1 bound to βarr1. Data were analyzed by an unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism. Adjusted p values are indicated. n.s., not significant. STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Incubation, Variant Assay, SDS Page, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 5. Analysis of STAM1 ubiquitination by preactivated β-arrestin1. Ubiquitination reactions as described in Experimental procedures were incubated with 40 nM WT βarr1 (WT) or preactivated variant of βarr1 (R169E) in the presence or absence of 1 mM ATP with WT ubiquitin (WT Ub) (A) or lysine-less ubiquitin (0K Ub) (D). Reactions were terminated in 2× sample buffer immediately (0 min) or after incubation at 37 C for 60 min. Reactions were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)], unmodified and monoubiquitinated (mono-Ub) STAM1 are indicated. Nonspecific bands are indicated. Data are representative of three independent experiments. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B and E) and ubiquitin (C and F) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as bar graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal with WT βarr1 and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed by an unpaired t test using GraphPad Prism. Adjusted p values are indicated. STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Incubation, Variant Assay, SDS Page, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 7. Evaluation of lysine 136 on STAM1-ΔCT ubiquitination with WT or lysine-less ubiquitin. Ubiquitination reactions were performed as described in Experimental procedures with STAM1 variant ΔC-tail in which lysine 136 has been substituted with an arginine (K136R). Reactions were performed in the presence of 40 nM preactivated β-arrestin1 and with WT ubiquitin (WT Ub) (A) or lysine-less ubiquitin (0K Ub) (D). Reactions were performed with or without 1 mM ATP and terminated immediately (0 min) or after incubation at 37 C for 60 min in 2× sample buffer. Reactions were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)], unmodified and monoubiquitinated (mono-Ub) STAM1 are indicated. Representative immunoblots are shown. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B and E) and ubiquitin (C and F) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as bar graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal from WT ΔCT and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent experiments. Data were analyzed by ene-way ANOVA GraphPad Prism. Adjusted p values are indicated. STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Variant Assay, Incubation, SDS Page, Western Blot
Figure Legend Snippet: Figure 6. Evaluation of deleting the C-terminus on STAM1 ubiquitination. Ubiquitination reactions as described in Experimental procedures were performed with a truncated variant of STAM1 (ΔC-tail) that is still able to bind to β-arr1. Reactions were incubated with 40 nM WT β-arr1 (WT) or pre- activated variant of β-arr1 (R169E) or vehicle (n/a) in the presence or absence of 1 mM ATP with WT ubiquitin (WT Ub) (A) or lysine-less ubiquitin (0K Ub) (D). Reactions were terminated in 2× sample buffer immediately (0 min) or after incubation at 37 C for 60 min. Reactions were analyzed by 7% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. Polyubiquitinated [Ub(n)], unmodified, monoubiquitinated (mono-Ub) STAM1 and nonspecific bands are indicated. Representative im- munoblots are shown. STAM1 ubiquitination was quantified from the STAM (B and E) and ubiquitin (C and F) immunoblots using densitometry and shown as bar graphs. Data were expressed relative to the signal without βarr1 (“−“, minus symbol) and represent the mean ± S.D. from three independent ex- periments. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA GraphPad Prism. Adjusted p values are indicated. STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule.
Techniques Used: Ubiquitin Proteomics, Variant Assay, Incubation, SDS Page, Western Blot
Related Articles
Ubiquitin Proteomics:Article Title: A ubiquitin switch controls autocatalytic inactivation of the DNA–protein crosslink repair protease SPRTN Article Snippet: The E2 screen was conducted using the E2 screening kit (UBPBio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. .. In brief, human E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (2 μM) were incubated together with catalytically inactive SPRTN-E112Q (EQ) (2 μM), E1 ubiquitin activating enzyme (100 nM), ubiquitin (R&D Systems, U-100H, 50 μM) or no Incubation:Article Title: A ubiquitin switch controls autocatalytic inactivation of the DNA–protein crosslink repair protease SPRTN Article Snippet: The E2 screen was conducted using the E2 screening kit (UBPBio) according to the manufacturer's instructions. .. In brief, human E2 ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (2 μM) were incubated together with catalytically inactive SPRTN-E112Q (EQ) (2 μM), E1 ubiquitin activating enzyme (100 nM), ubiquitin (R&D Systems, U-100H, 50 μM) or no |
